Normativity

Wide Reflective Equilibrium

Wide Reflective Equilibrium Assistant

This workspace supports mutual adjustment among considered judgments, general principles, and background theories. Build your map, identify tensions, revise selectively, and record rationale for each deliberative step.

SEP Source Map For This Workflow

Use this assistant as a method tool, not a proof machine. These core entries explain why: reflective equilibrium is iterative; disagreement is evidential pressure; and theory choice must be tested against cases, principles, and background assumptions together.

Considered Judgments

Add concrete moral judgments you currently take seriously.

General Principles

Add candidate principles that might systematize judgments.

Background Theories

Add empirical or metaphysical assumptions shaping assessment.

Deliberation Workspace

Drag cards, connect relations, and iteratively adjust commitments.

Guided Deliberation Steps

Rationale Log